If you cannot read this newsletter, click on this text to go to our website WWW.TORDAHL.COM

Tor Dahl head banner

Subject
 

The Value of A Human Life

   The first time I wrestled with the problem of putting a dollar value on a human life was as an expert witness in a court case.  An 11-year-old boy had had his intestines sucked out of him by a faulty valve in a city swimming pool.  Miraculously, he had survived.  He would need to receive total parenteral feeding through as tube in his neck for the rest of his life, but he was likely to enjoy a normal life expectancy since his "diet" was healthier than that of most people, he was otherwise fine, and he was intelligent about his fate.

   The city's insurance company had offered $1 million for the care and feeding of the boy.  I estimated the cost to be $11 million.  The case was settled — literally on the courthouse steps — for $11 million while I was waiting, airplane ticket in hand, for a summons to testify.

   Admittedly, I had focused on the cost of a human life in this case.

   What if they had asked me to estimate the value of the boy's life?  This is a much more difficult task, and it goes to the core of our value system and our sense of fairness.  Grief is not proportional to income.  And if, indeed, "… all men [people] are created equal … and … endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, and that among these rights are life …," then we ponder if we are all equal in life.

   Every day, doctors and nurses undertake the extraordinarily challenging task of performing a bedside benefit / cost analysis of the value of a human life that may be in extreme danger.  The decision to give or withhold treatment in the absence of a patient's known wishes and the consideration of a loving family, forces caregivers to face this problem head on.  So let's take a look at what the dismal science of economics may teach us about the value of a human life.

   The per capita income of the U.S. today is about $40,000.00. The equivalent capital amount, invested at 4 percent interest, would have to be $1 million in order to produce a revenue stream equal in value to the average human being generating this income.  Human capital theory thus offers this answer: The average American is worth $1 million.

   On May 14, 1896, Senator Knute Nelson of Minnesota gave a speech in the U.S. Senate. The issue was about whether more restrictions should be placed on immigration to the U.S., given that before 1890, there were virtually none. As a part of that speech, Senator Nelson reviewed the capital value immigrants brought to the nation. Estimates at that time ranged from $200 to $1,200, plus an additional $50 average cash-in-hand upon arrival in the U.S. The nominal GDP per capita in 1896 was $216, so an equivalent capital value of an average American that year was $5,400, using the same reasoning that was used to estimate that an American life today is worth $1 million. But of the 71 million U.S. population at that time, 41% were either foreign-born or had at least one parent who was foreign-born. Then, as now, immigrants supplied labor for tasks that lifted the rest of the population into jobs that paid higher wages. In light of the facts, it seems far-fetched to value their contributions as low as $200 per immigrant — or even at $1,200, for that matter.

   The point is that immigrants have always been valued as net positive assets in the studies that have been made of their total contribution to a society. The very fact that they are here usually indicates that they are motivated, decisive and entrepreneurial. Indeed, school records from their home countries usually bear this out. The fact that they bring new perspectives and different cultural preferences to their new country ensures that Minnesota will not be stuck with lutefisk and sauerkraut as its favorite foods. The fact that it is initially costly to support immigrants' children with education and health care ignores the simple fact that these expenses are investments in human lives — investments that will pay off handsomely in the years to come.

   The U.S. population is projected to shrink dramatically this coming century if fertility and immigration rates stay at the current level. Eventually, today's 4:1 ratio of workers to the retirees whom they support, will shrink to 1:1. Against this, we have only two principal counter-strategies:

1.Increase productivity so that the one worker in the future is paid, and contributes, as much as the four workers of today;

or

2.Increase our rate of immigration.

   Otherwise, the next few generations may be poorer that the baby-boomer generation, and we shall have to make dramatic — and probably unwanted — adjustments to Social Security and health care.

   Edward Young, Chief of the Bureau of Statistics in 1896, submitted his estimate of the value of an immigrant to the United States: 

 From the foregoing considerations, therefore, the sum of $800 seems to be the full average capital value of each immigrant.  At this rate, those who landed upon our shores during the year just closed added upward of $285,000,000 to our national wealth, while during the last half century the increment from this source exceeds $6,243,880,800.  It is impossible to make an intelligent estimate of the value to the country of those foreign-born citizens who brought their educated minds, their cultivated tastes, their skill in the arts, and their inventive genius.  In almost every walk of life their influence has been felt. 

 

Alike in the fearful ordeal of war and in the pursuits of peace, in our legislative halls, and in the various learned professions, the adopted sons of America have attained eminence. Among the many who rendered timely aid to our country during the late war, it may seem invidious to mention a single name, except for the purpose of illustration.  In the year 1839 there arrived at the port of New York, in the steamship British Queen, which sailed from the port of London, a Swedish immigrant, better known as Capt. John Ericsson.  What was his value to the country, as estimated on the 9th day of March, 1863?  Was it eight hundred, eight thousand, or eight million dollars? [1]

   On that day, the ironclad Monitor, designed by Captain John Ericsson, met the Merrimac.  They met in decisive battle — the Monitor to safeguard the ships that were blockading the Confederacy, the Merrimac to break the blockade.  England, France and Spain had signaled that their support would be switched to the Confederacy if the Union could not maintain the blockade's integrity and the war's momentum.

   Captain Ericsson had already made naval history by inventing the screw propeller.  He put his talents as an innovator and naval officer to work for his adopted country at the point when her fate was being decided, and became one of the most important figures of the Civil War.

   So, what was his life worth when he entered the U.S. in 1839?  $800?  $8,000?  $8,000,000?

   And what is the true value for the lives of all the other immigrants who were to follow?  Here is a very short list: 

Albert Einstein Elizabeth Taylor Carlos Santana
Wolfgang Puck Peter Jennings Sammy Sosa
Mikhail Baryshnikov Andrew Grove John Kenneth Galbraith
Peter F. Drucker André Previn Zubin Mehta
Oscar de la Renta Itzak Perlman Ann Margret
Knut Rockne Mike Nichols Bob Hope
Isabel Allende Ricardo Montalban Gloria Estefan
Liz Claiborne Madeline Albright Placido Domingo
John Shalikashvili Elie Wiesel Elizabeth Kubler-Ross
Cesar Pelli Hans Bethe Billy Wilder
Irving Berlin Al Jolson Henry Kissinger
Frank Capra Anthony Quinn Rupert Murdoch
Jennifer Granholm Wayne Gretzky Patrick Ewing
Alexander Solzenitsyn Isaac Stern Esa Pekka Salonen
Werner von Braun Michael Fox Arnold Schwartzenegger
Cary Grant Greta Garbo Ole Rolvaag

   I am an immigrant to this country.  I look at the list of names in the above, and I am humbled by the contributions they made to their adopted country.  There must have been something about the United States that lifted their spirits and unleashed achievements beyond every reasonable expectation.

  Moving to another country creates a kind of immigrant energy — a drive to accomplish and excel.  When a new culture, new customs and new ways surround you, effort is required of you that natives need not exert.

  But there is something else as well.

  If you live in the U.S., you can select the best from a hundred different cultures, and live a life you could never have lived in any other country.

  That is the power of diversity.  That is the promise of America.

  Even if you can't read or write, even if you are poor and very new to this country, you can feel this promise.  It is embedded in the Declaration of Independence.  We live and breathe what it says:

  We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

  These stirring words may not be the reason why all those immigrants came.

  But it well may be the reason why they stayed.


[1] Congressional Record. May 14, 1896.

 TorSignature

Tor Dahl & Associates Productivity Improvement Seminar

Leading, innovative companies understand the power of productivity as the strategy for achieving greater corporate performance and bottom line results. Yet, most companies do not apply a systematic and rigorous process for realizing their untapped productivity potential. 80% of all corporate initiatives focus instead on efficiency improvements that are not tied to overall growth objectives and do not produce any breakthroughs in performance. Productivity improvement, on the other hand, is so highly leveraged that even small increases can dramatically affect revenue, cost effectiveness and profits, while raising employee satisfaction and customer delight. For publicly held companies, stock prices and market capitalization can increase dramatically.

Tor Dahl & Associates is the world leader in this “new” field of productivity. We have debunked the old myth that productivity takes away jobs and that it is only concerned about “doing more with less”. Our successful productivity strategy is rooted in the fundamental belief that productivity is about removing barriers to individual performance, freeing up resources from unproductive processes and reallocating those resources to higher yield activities that support organizational growth objectives. It is a positive method that leads to greater earned competitive advantage, increased job satisfaction and positive employee engagement, rather than job losses and downsizing.

Tor Dahl & Associates offers a compressed tutorial for corporate teams during which the fundamental principles of productivity will be taught and practiced. It is an enjoyable, stimulating, practical and valuable session that identifies key factors that impact productivity and how your organization can apply this insight to make dramatic improvements in personal and organizational performance. Contact us now to arrange for a customized tutorial for your leadership team.
 
Passing on this newsletter to a friend or colleague is the best compliment we can receive. Please feel free to share this with others!

If you received this from a friend and wish to receive your own copy of our E-Newsletters in the future, please send your request to Info@tordahl.com.

If you don't wish to receive this E-Newsletter anymore, please reply to this with "unsubscribe" in the subject line.

We invite you to visit our website to learn more about achieving High Performance at www.tordahl.com